Current:Home > reviewsVoters in Arizona and Montana can decide on constitutional right to abortion -Blueprint Wealth Network
Voters in Arizona and Montana can decide on constitutional right to abortion
View
Date:2025-04-14 15:04:54
PHOENIX (AP) — Voters in Arizona and Montana will be able to decide in November whether they want to protect the right to an abortion in their state constitutions.
The Arizona Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that a 200-word summary that abortion advocates used to collect signatures for a ballot measure is valid, clearing the way for the issue to remain on the ballot.
Montana Secretary of State Christi Jacobsen on Tuesday certified Montana’s constitutional initiative for the November ballot.
Under both measures, abortions would be allowed until fetal viability — the point at which a fetus could survive outside the womb, typically around 24 weeks.
In Arizona, there are some exceptions for post-viability abortions to save the mother’s life or to protect her physical or mental health. Montana’s measure allows later abortions if needed to protect the mother’s life or health.
Montana’s initiative would enshrine in the constitution a 1999 state Supreme Court ruling that found the constitutional right to privacy includes the right of a patient to receive an abortion from a provider of their choice. Supporters sought to protect the right as Republican lawmakers passed bills to restrict abortion rights.
Voters in more than a half-dozen states will be deciding abortion measures this fall. The U.S. Supreme Court removed the nationwide right to abortion with a 2022 ruling, which sparked a national push to have voters decide.
“Since Roe was overturned, extreme anti-abortion politicians have used every trick in the book to take away our freedoms and ban abortion completely,” Martha Fuller, president and CEO of Planned Parenthood of Montana, said in a statement. “During that time, we have been working together to put this issue before voters.”
Recent decisions from the Arizona Supreme Court come ahead of a Thursday ballot printing deadline. Montana’s ballot must be certified by Thursday.
Arizona’s justices sided with Republican lawmakers in a separate case concerning the abortion ballot measure last week to allow a voter information pamphlet to refer to an embryo or fetus as an “unborn human being.” That language will not appear on the ballots.
In another case, the justices ruled a legislative proposal to let local police make arrests near the state’s border with Mexico will appear on the ballot for voters to decide. The court had rejected a challenge from Latino groups that argued the ballot measure violated a rule in the state constitution that says legislative proposals must cover a single subject.
In the latest abortion measure case, Arizona Right to Life sued over the petition summary, arguing it was misleading.
The high court justices rejected that argument, as well as the claim that the petition summary for the proposed amendment failed to mention it would overturn existing abortion laws if approved by voters. The court in its ruling states that “(r)easonable people” can differ over the best way to describe a key provision of a ballot measure, but a court should not entangle itself in those disputes.
“Regardless of the ruling, we are looking forward to working with our pro-life partners across the state to continue to inform voters about this ambiguous language,” said Susan Haugland, spokesperson for Arizona Right to Life.
Arizona for Abortion Access, which launched the initiative, said the ruling is a “huge win” and advocates will be working around the clock to encourage voters to support it.
“We are confident that this fall, Arizona voters will make history by establishing a fundamental right to abortion in our state, once and for all,” the group said in a statement.
The Arizona secretary of state’s office recently certified 577,971 signatures — far above the number required to put the question before voters.
Democrats have made abortion rights a central message since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022 — and it is a key part of their efforts in this year’s elections.
veryGood! (3668)
Related
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- The Biggest Bravo Casting Shakeups of 2024 (So Far)
- Tyla Wearing $230,000 Worth of Diamonds at 2024 BET Awards Is Pure ART
- Travis Kelce Joined by Julia Roberts at Taylor Swift's Third Dublin Eras Tour Show
- Don't let hackers fool you with a 'scam
- Massive roof section at Delhi international airport collapses in storm, crushing cars and killing one driver
- Houston LGBT+ Pride Festival and Parade 2024: Route, date, time and where to watch events
- Trump Media stock price down more than 10% after days-long rebound in continued volatility
- Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
- Looking forward and back as the Civil Rights Act turns 60
Ranking
- Trump's 'stop
- 2 police officers wounded, suspect killed in shooting in Waterloo, Iowa
- Detroit cops overhaul facial recognition policies after rotten arrest
- Inside Khloe Kardashian's Dollywood-Inspired 40th Birthday Party With Snoop Dogg
- What to watch: O Jolie night
- Why Eric Dane Thinks He Was Fired From Grey’s Anatomy
- Inside Khloe Kardashian's Dollywood-Inspired 40th Birthday Party With Snoop Dogg
- Usher's Sweet Tribute to Fatherhood at 2024 BET Awards Got Us Fallin' in Love
Recommendation
Intel's stock did something it hasn't done since 2022
US Olympic gymnastics trials recap: Fred Richard wins; who made team?
Germany’s game with Denmark resumes at Euro 2024 after thunderstorm
Looking forward and back as the Civil Rights Act turns 60
Juan Soto praise of Mets' future a tough sight for Yankees, but World Series goal remains
CDK cyberattack update: Select dealerships seeing Dealer Management System restored
Shaboozey Shoots His Shot on an Usher Collab
Teofimo Lopez vs. Steve Claggett fight live updates: Round-by-round analysis of title bout